While I agree with your article's point, as a former HR professional, I disagree with this part -

"Feminism has suddenly shifted to view an empowered woman as one who is more masculine. Essentially a woman is only empowered when she leaves many of her feminine traits."

I'm not sure many women wanted this, but there was little choice when the patriarchy was/is running the show.

I worked on a project decades ago, for a huge global company. The quest was to identify the traits the company wanted to recruit - (Not a bad idea, given how random some recruitment can be). How we did this was to look at current partners and leaders (all men), identify their traits and then recruit and promote using them as criteria. (Not my idea, btw). Ergo, women who wanted to a) get the job, and b) rise thru the ranks, had to demonstrate these qualities.

I very much believe that the "be more manly" approach was, if done by feminists willingly, a desperate effort to gain access to the boys' club. And yes, it might have been empowering because it got women the jobs, but I'm not sure they were 100% happy about the process.